[Mono-bugs] [Bug 36376][Nor] Changed - mcs produces different output for enums than csc
Sat, 11 Jan 2003 18:46:52 -0500 (EST)
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by email@example.com.
--- shadow/36376 Tue Jan 7 07:19:03 2003
+++ shadow/36376.tmp.18920 Sat Jan 11 18:46:52 2003
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
@@ -93,6 +93,21 @@
------- Additional Comments From firstname.lastname@example.org 2003-01-07 07:19 -------
The behaviour is fine according to our reading of the spec (and the
behaviour of the ms runtime). The portable.net people should have
fixed their loader to deal with it already.
+------- Additional Comments From email@example.com 2003-01-11 18:46 -------
+I recently found additional information on enum declarations in Partition I,
+Section 7.5.2, which I had not seen previously. According to CLS Rule 9,
+"Literal static fields (see clause 7.6.1) of an enum shall have the type of the
+enum itself." In the examples I posted originally, notice that the static literal
+fields have type int32 and not the type of the enum itself, which would be
+"valueType QFont/Weight". In light of this, I really think that this is a bug that
+needs to be corrected. Although Microsoft's tools currently do not complain
+about this output from mcs, it is conceivable that future versions might be
+more strict about these declarations, so it seems reasonable to fix this
+problem. And, of course, there is the issue that it's best to match csc's output