[Mono-bugs] [Bug 51850][Nor] Changed - Another Bug when hitting WebLogic Web Service

bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 09:52:00 -0500 (EST)


Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by lluis@ximian.com.

http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=51850

--- shadow/51850	2003-12-08 00:23:43.000000000 -0500
+++ shadow/51850.tmp.1221	2003-12-08 09:52:00.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
 Bug#: 51850
 Product: Mono/Class Libraries
 Version: unspecified
-OS: 
+OS: unknown
 OS Details: 
-Status: NEW   
-Resolution: 
-Severity: 
+Status: RESOLVED   
+Resolution: FIXED
+Severity: Unknown
 Priority: Normal
 Component: System.Web
 AssignedTo: mono-bugs@ximian.com                            
 ReportedBy: davidandrewtaylor@hotmail.com               
 QAContact: mono-bugs@ximian.com
 TargetMilestone: ---
@@ -52,6 +52,26 @@
 I am having no luck at all using MONO as a client to hit Web Services 
 hosted by AXIS or BEA WebLogic.  I would take a wild stab-in-the-dark 
 that a lot of the current MONO web service client code is currently 
 assuming the SOAP format will be exactly the same as outputted by MS.NET 
 when run on the server side.  We need to make sure MONO is tested against 
 a reasonable range of web service servers.
+
+------- Additional Comments From lluis@ximian.com  2003-12-08 09:51 -------
+This is now fixed in cvs.
+
+> I am having no luck at all using MONO as a client to hit Web
+> Services hosted by AXIS or BEA WebLogic.  I would take a wild
+> stab-in-the-dark that a lot of the current MONO web service
+> client code is currently assuming the SOAP format will be
+> exactly the same as outputted by MS.NET when run on the server
+> side.  
+
+That's not true. The client code is not assuming any specific SOAP
+format. But since it has been tested mainly on .NET servers, it is
+normal find new bugs when testing against other servers.
+
+> We need to make sure MONO is tested against a reasonable
+> range of web service servers.
+
+I Agree, and your help here is very valuable.
+