[Mono-bugs] [Bug 30338][Nor] Changed - (mono_cfg_new): assertion failed: (((MonoMethodNormal *)method)->header)

[bugzilla-daemon@rocky.ximian.com]

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by gonzalo@ximian.com.

http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=30338

--- shadow/30338	Wed Sep 25 14:59:40 2002
+++ shadow/30338.tmp.20217	Fri Apr 11 21:33:41 2003
@@ -109,6 +109,17 @@
 Do you mean the ".property special runtime int64 Foo ()" instead of ".property int64 Foo ()" or is there something else ?
 
 I compared the generated IL code and that's the only difference I could find.  If this is a problem, when does a property need to 
 have "special runtime" and when not ?
 
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From gonzalo@ximian.com  2003-04-11 21:33 -------
+I get:
+8
+as output now either compiling with mcs (under MS runtime) or csc.
+But when compiled with mcs, the MS runtime complains:
+~ $ ./bug30338.exe
+
+Unhandled Exception: System.TypeLoadException: Method get_Foo in type
+Y from assembly get_Foo does not have an implementation.
+   at Z.Main()