[Mono-bugs] [Bug 30338][Nor] Changed - (mono_cfg_new): assertion failed: (((MonoMethodNormal *)method)->header)
25 Sep 2002 18:59:40 -0000
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by firstname.lastname@example.org.
--- shadow/30338 Wed Sep 25 10:42:42 2002
+++ shadow/30338.tmp.20799 Wed Sep 25 14:59:40 2002
@@ -101,6 +101,14 @@
There is a runtime bug: somehow the vtable is wrong since the get_Foo
method in Y is assigned a different slot than the get_Foo in X.
However, mcs still miscompiles the code when run on either the mono or
the ms runtime.
BTW: compiling with mcs in mono the Y class also implements the I
+------- Additional Comments From email@example.com 2002-09-25 14:59 -------
+Do you mean the ".property special runtime int64 Foo ()" instead of ".property int64 Foo ()" or is there something else ?
+I compared the generated IL code and that's the only difference I could find. If this is a problem, when does a property need to
+have "special runtime" and when not ?