[Mono-bugs] [Bug 30338][Nor] Changed - (mono_cfg_new): assertion failed: (((MonoMethodNormal *)method)->header)

[bugzilla-daemon@rocky.ximian.com]

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by martin@gnome.org.

http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=30338

--- shadow/30338	Wed Sep 25 10:42:42 2002
+++ shadow/30338.tmp.20799	Wed Sep 25 14:59:40 2002
@@ -101,6 +101,14 @@
 There is a runtime bug: somehow the vtable is wrong since the get_Foo
 method in Y is assigned a different slot than the get_Foo in X.
 However, mcs still miscompiles the code when run on either the mono or
 the ms runtime.
 BTW: compiling with mcs in mono the Y class also implements the I
 interface.
+
+------- Additional Comments From martin@gnome.org  2002-09-25 14:59 -------
+Do you mean the ".property special runtime int64 Foo ()" instead of ".property int64 Foo ()" or is there something else ?
+
+I compared the generated IL code and that's the only difference I could find.  If this is a problem, when does a property need to 
+have "special runtime" and when not ?
+
+