[Mono-bugs] [Bug 31172][Wis] New - Assignment of decimal to element of decimal[] missing ldelema
bugzilla-daemon@rocky.ximian.com
bugzilla-daemon@rocky.ximian.com
25 Sep 2002 00:20:15 -0000
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by hwang_rob@yahoo.ca.
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=31172
--- shadow/31172 Tue Sep 24 20:20:15 2002
+++ shadow/31172.tmp.8074 Tue Sep 24 20:20:15 2002
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+Bug#: 31172
+Product: Mono/MCS
+Version: unspecified
+OS:
+OS Details:
+Status: NEW
+Resolution:
+Severity:
+Priority: Wishlist
+Component: Misc
+AssignedTo: mono-bugs@ximian.com
+ReportedBy: hwang_rob@yahoo.ca
+QAContact: mono-bugs@ximian.com
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL:
+Cc:
+Summary: Assignment of decimal to element of decimal[] missing ldelema
+
+Please fill in this template when reporting a bug, unless you know what you
+are doing.
+Description of Problem:
+
+mcs does not emit an ldelema opcode when assigning a decimal value to an
+element of a 1D decimal array. As a result, the subsequent stobj does not
+have the correct values on the stack.
+
+Steps to reproduce the problem:
+1. Compile the following test program:
+
+using System;
+
+public class DecimalTest
+{
+ public static void Main()
+ {
+ decimal[] t = new decimal[1];
+ Decimal d = 10m;
+ t[0] = d;
+ }
+}
+
+2. Examine bytecode with monodis DecimalTest.exe
+
+Actual Results:
+
+ // method line 2
+ .method public static
+ default void Main() cil managed
+ {
+ // Method begins at RVA 0x20f4
+ .entrypoint
+ // Code size 28 (0x1c)
+ .maxstack 6
+ .locals init (
+ valuetype [corlib]System.Decimal[] V_0,
+ valuetype [corlib]System.Decimal V_1)
+ IL_0000: ldc.i4.1
+ IL_0001: newarr [mscorlib]System.Decimal
+ IL_0006: stloc.0
+ IL_0007: ldc.i4.s 0x0a
+ IL_0009: ldc.i4.0
+ IL_000a: ldc.i4.0
+ IL_000b: ldc.i4.0
+ IL_000c: ldc.i4.0
+ IL_000d: newobj instance void valuetype
+[corlib]System.Decimal::.ctor(int32, int32, int32, bool, unsigned int8)
+ IL_0012: stloc.1
+ IL_0013: ldloc.0
+ IL_0014: ldc.i4.0
+ IL_0015: ldloc.1
+ IL_0016: stobj [mscorlib]System.Decimal
+ IL_001b: ret
+ } // end of method default void Main()
+
+
+Expected Results:
+
+ // method line 2
+ .method public static
+ default void Main() cil managed
+ {
+ // Method begins at RVA 0x20f4
+ .entrypoint
+ // Code size 33 (0x21)
+ .maxstack 6
+ .locals init (
+ valuetype [corlib]System.Decimal[] V_0,
+ valuetype [corlib]System.Decimal V_1)
+ IL_0000: ldc.i4.1
+ IL_0001: newarr [mscorlib]System.Decimal
+ IL_0006: stloc.0
+ IL_0007: ldc.i4.s 0x0a
+ IL_0009: ldc.i4.0
+ IL_000a: ldc.i4.0
+ IL_000b: ldc.i4.0
+ IL_000c: ldc.i4.0
+ IL_000d: newobj instance void valuetype
+[corlib]System.Decimal::.ctor(int32, int32, int32, bool, unsigned int8)
+ IL_0012: stloc.1
+ IL_0013: ldloc.0
+ IL_0014: ldc.i4.0
+ IL_0015: ldelema [mscorlib]System.Decimal
+ IL_001a: ldloc.1
+ IL_001b: stobj [mscorlib]System.Decimal
+ IL_0020: ret
+ } // end of method default void Main()
+
+
+
+How often does this happen?
+Always.
+
+Additional Information:
+One-line patch to expression.cs (1.356) attached.