[Mono-bugs] [Bug 24002] Changed - not all systems have spinlock calls implemented in pthread

[bugzilla-daemon@rocky.ximian.com]

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by fejj@ximian.com.

http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=24002

--- shadow/24002	Mon Apr 29 12:09:23 2002
+++ shadow/24002.tmp.4732	Tue Apr 30 18:23:40 2002
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
 Bug#: 24002
 Product: Mono/Runtime
 Version: unspecified
 OS: other
 OS Details: 
-Status: NEW   
-Resolution: 
-Severity: 
+Status: RESOLVED   
+Resolution: FIXED
+Severity: Unknown
 Priority: Normal
 Component: misc
 AssignedTo: mono-bugs@ximian.com                            
 ReportedBy: lupus@ximian.com               
 QAContact: mono-bugs@ximian.com
 TargetMilestone: ---
@@ -20,6 +20,12 @@
 ./io-layer/atomic.c:
 I removed the spinlocks.  This is a hack : pthreads doesn't have the
 spinlock calls on ARM, multi-cpus not supported. Should the atomic
 routines be coded in assembly ?  Does it matter ?
 
 We need to add a check in configure and a workaround for it.
+
+------- Additional Comments From fejj@ximian.com  2002-04-30 18:23 -------
+I just changed it to use a normal pthread_mutex_t
+
+Dick says we should probably just have native asm to make these
+actions atomic rather than using locks at some point though.