[Mono-bugs] [Bug 24002] Changed - not all systems have spinlock calls implemented in pthread
30 Apr 2002 22:23:40 -0000
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by firstname.lastname@example.org.
--- shadow/24002 Mon Apr 29 12:09:23 2002
+++ shadow/24002.tmp.4732 Tue Apr 30 18:23:40 2002
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
@@ -20,6 +20,12 @@
I removed the spinlocks. This is a hack : pthreads doesn't have the
spinlock calls on ARM, multi-cpus not supported. Should the atomic
routines be coded in assembly ? Does it matter ?
We need to add a check in configure and a workaround for it.
+------- Additional Comments From email@example.com 2002-04-30 18:23 -------
+I just changed it to use a normal pthread_mutex_t
+Dick says we should probably just have native asm to make these
+actions atomic rather than using locks at some point though.