[Mono-aspnet-list] How to check/force ASP.NET to use Mono compiled from SVN trunk

[Diego Frata]

Thanks for making it clear Robert! But still, it doesn't help in anything to
have both ASP.NET Version and Mono Version showing the same value. It
clearly induces to an error and makes it harder to track down problems. Why
can't that be changed?

Diego Frata
diego.frata at gmail.com


On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Robert Jordan <robertj at gmx.net> wrote:

> Diego Frata wrote:
> > I noticed that and that's probably a bug. There's no release of mono with
> > that version number. That version number is the official version number
> of
> > Microsoft .NET 2.0.
>
> This is not a bug. Mono must have the same official MS.NET
> version numbers.
>
> > Now, for pre-compiled web sites, did you upgrade your mod-mono?
> >
> > http://anonsvn.mono-project.com/source/trunk/mod_mono
> > <http://anonsvn.mono-project.com/source/trunk/mono>
>
> And xsp: http://anonsvn.mono-project.com/source/trunk/xsp
> which contains the managed part of mod_mono.
>
> Robert
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Hope  this helps
> >
> > Diego Frata
> > diego.frata at gmail.com
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Jan van der watt
> > <janvanderwatt at gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Diego,
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >> You noticed that TWO version numbers are displayed?
> >>
> >> *Version information: *
> >> **Mono Version: 2.0.50727.42;
> >> ASP.NET Version: 2.0.50727.42
> >>
> >> I get that the SECOND one is the ASP.NET version, but shouldn't the
> FIRST
> >> one display the MONO version in use?
> >>
> >> I am still a little confused/suspicious, as pre-compiled web sites
> started
> >> working in Mono 2.4 (i think). Yet, when I upload my pre-compiled
> version to
> >> this "2.5" box, it DOES NOT WORK (i.e. the contents of the ASPX file is
> >> displayed "This is a marker file generated by the precompilation tool,
> and
> >> should not be deleted!"). If I upload the un-compiled pages, the site
> works,
> >> of course.
> >>
> >> I expect this to be the case for 2.0, but since I compiled a 2.5 trunk,
> my
> >> pre-compiled site SHOULD also work (like on my Mono 2.4 box), should it
> not?
> >>
> >> Thanks for the help.
> >>
> >> Best regards
> >>
> >> Jan
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Diego Frata <diego.frata at gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> The 2.0.50727.42 identifies that you're running a website based on
> version
> >>> 2.0 of ASP.NET. This has nothing to do with the version of mono that's
> >>> installed on the machine.
> >>>
> >>> The version you're running is the one you saw when you # mono --version
> >>> :-)
> >>>
> >>> Diego Frata
> >>> diego.frata at gmail.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Jan van der watt <
> >>> janvanderwatt at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>> I hope this is the right forum. I am trying to test that a bug has
> been
> >>>> fixed in the latest trunk (
> >>>> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507663).
> >>>>
> >>>> I installed MONO 2.0 from the openSuse DVD, then fetched the latest
> trunk
> >>>> of mono from SVN, compiled it and installed it using:
> >>>>
> >>>>   $ svn co http://anonsvn.mono-project.com/source/trunk/mono
> >>>>   $ svn co http://anonsvn.mono-project.com/source/trunk/mcs
> >>>>   $ svn co http://anonsvn.mono-project.com/source/trunk/libgdiplus
> >>>>
> >>>>   $ cd mono
> >>>>   $ ./autogen.sh --prefix=/usr/local
> >>>>   $ make
> >>>>   $ make install
> >>>>
> >>>> (it compiled OK, and most of the tests passed as well - well done to
> the
> >>>> MONO team - it wasn't problematic at all, up to this point!).
> >>>>
> >>>> # mono --version
> >>>> Mono JIT compiler version >>> 2.5 (/trunk/mono r139703 Tue Aug 11
> >>>> 23:36:19 EST 2009) <<<
> >>>> Copyright (C) 2002-2008 Novell, Inc and Contributors.
> >>>> www.mono-project.com
> >>>>         TLS:           __thread
> >>>>         GC:            Included Boehm (with typed GC and Parallel
> Mark)
> >>>>         SIGSEGV:       altstack
> >>>>         Notifications: epoll
> >>>>         Architecture:  x86
> >>>>         Disabled:      none
> >>>>
> >>>> I take this to show that the Mono executable on the path is the one
> that
> >>>> I built.
> >>>>
> >>>> However, when I get an error on my ASP.NET page (meaning the bug has
> not
> >>>> been fixed), the versions reported are:
> >>>>
> >>>> *Version information: *Mono Version: >>> 2.0.50727.42; ASP.NETVersion:
> >>>> 2.0.50727.42 <<<
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> So, now I'm not sure that the version that I compiled is in fact being
> >>>> used.
> >>>>
> >>>> Am I just confused? Did I miss something? How do I tell Apache to use
> the
> >>>> version I compiled, or did "make install" do that for me (by replacing
> the
> >>>> mono 2.0 binaries)?
> >>>>
> >>>> Any help would be appreciated.
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm running openSUSE 11.1, on a clean freshly installed virtual
> machine
> >>>> (yesterday). Mono is used under Apache 2 (virtual host).
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> Jan
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Mono-aspnet-list mailing list
> >>>> Mono-aspnet-list at lists.ximian.com
> >>>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-aspnet-list
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mono-aspnet-list mailing list
> > Mono-aspnet-list at lists.ximian.com
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-aspnet-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-aspnet-list mailing list
> Mono-aspnet-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-aspnet-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-aspnet-list/attachments/20090812/c3231f96/attachment.html