[Gtk-sharp-list] Towards GTK# 3.0

[Nicholas Frechette]

Is an intermediary release planned for gtk# 2.x to fix the
g_thread_support issue?

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:54 AM, Lluis Sanchez Gual
<slluis.devel at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> El 30/07/2012, a las 18:36, Bertrand Lorentz <bertrand.lorentz at gmail.com>
> escribió:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Some comments below.
>
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Mike Kestner <mkestner at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Bertrand,
>
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Bertrand Lorentz
> <bertrand.lorentz at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> When I tried to run the Banshee GTK3 branch, the main issue I hit was
> in fact a regression in GTK+ itself:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=679232
> I guess it's a good sign about the state of the bindings themselves. ;)
>
>
> I think the binding itself is in pretty good shape, and has been for a
> while now.  There were a few tweaks needed for the Banshee port.  MD
> would be another good test, but I doubt you will talk anyone into a v3
> port of it.
>
>
> That is also my impression after talking to a few MD guys. The
> cost/benefit is just not there for them.
>
>
> Our current plan is to incrementally migrate MD to XWT
> (https://github.com/mono/xwt), since it will allow us to run MD using the
> native widgets in each platform we support. All we need then is a GTK# 3
> backend for XWT.
>
> Lluis.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gtk-sharp-list maillist  -  Gtk-sharp-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gtk-sharp-list
>