[Gtk-sharp-list] Merge gtkpell-sharp into gtk-sharp?
zac at zacbowling.com
Thu Mar 9 22:51:18 EST 2006
It's not a big deal. Just an idea :-)
Was thinking it would be nice just for helping expose more people to it
and make it more of a viable library for using when programming because
developers know it's most likely included. Being in one suite, the
libraries would be more likely to get all the libraries packaged by the
various distros and then in-turn get preinstalled on more machines.
It's a silly argumment to make a big deal out of, I know, as it really
shouldn't matter. If a distro wants to package any app that uses them,
they need to bring the libraries with it so thats one to get it in
there. Though, possibly including it in the Windows and Linux binary
installers would be something to consider maybe.
It's not a big deal though. I'm also just thinking back to my own
painful experience, where I have found a few distros that include Gtk#
packages but then didn't include any other ones like gecko#, dbus#,
gtksourceview# or other fairly common gtk# related libraries.
----- Message from latexer at gentoo.org ---------
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 14:39:15 -0800
From: Peter Johanson <latexer at gentoo.org>
Reply-To: Peter Johanson <latexer at gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [Gtk-sharp-list] Merge gtkpell-sharp into gtk-sharp?
To: gtk-sharp-list at lists.ximian.com
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 04:04:31PM -0600, Zac Bowling wrote:
>> Hey guys,
>> It might be worth wild integrating gtkspell-sharp into the gtk-sharp
>> package. Seems like its a pretty good candidate (in svn under
>> Any comments or opinions towards doing that?
> One question: Why? What does that gain us over just doing releases of
> the binding as a separate package?
> Gtk-sharp-list maillist - Gtk-sharp-list at lists.ximian.com
----- End message from latexer at gentoo.org -----
More information about the Gtk-sharp-list