[Gtk-sharp-list] Ways of supporting complex data binding in TreeView

[Ales Vojacek]

Is something new about TreeView databinding? If so, where can I find 
more about it?
Thank you Ales

Todd Berman wrote:

>On Sat, 2005-05-28 at 05:07 -0700, Chas wrote:
>  
>
>>The question of which data-binding way to go is still
>>viable however, whether the TreeModel itself would be
>>100% managed or not. If you have any additional input
>>on that, I'd be happy to hear. (As you said, both ways
>>are suboptimal, so I'm afraid maybe both ways would
>>have to supported to allow for different scenarios
>>with different requirements.)
>>
>>Anyway, thanks for your response - I'll reconsider;
>>indeed, maybe waiting with this till it's possible to
>>do it in 100% managed code would be a smarter move.
>>    
>>
>
>
>Oh, thats the best part of writing a managed TreeModel implementation.
>gtk+ would ask your TreeModel for the data, so you wouldn't have to do
>much else to get it to work. In fact, Vlad has written a DataTableModel
>that is all managed code that works using DataSet not ITypedList, if you
>look at the archives to this list, I am sure you can find it.
>
>--Todd
>
>_______________________________________________
>Gtk-sharp-list maillist  -  Gtk-sharp-list at lists.ximian.com
>http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gtk-sharp-list
>
>
>  
>