[Gtk-sharp-list] gtk# docs assembly information

John Luke john.luke@gmail.com
Fri, 03 Dec 2004 17:02:04 -0500

On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 13:35 -0600, Mike Kestner wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 19:08 -0500, John Luke wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 	Some of the docs state the class is 'Assembly: gtk-sharp (in
> > gtk-sharp.dll)' it would be nice to make sure that the ones that existed
> > in 1.0 were marked as so.  The key is also inconsistently included.
> > Mostly this was caused by the original updater did not update this info.
> > I don't know if the newer versions do or not.
> > 
> > It's probably the matter of substituting for as the
> > newer stuff seems to be getting fine. sed would work fine for
> > the versions, but I thought someone want want to make a quick tool to do
> > both at once.
> There's multiple issues probably.  The assembly version reported for all
> these should probably be, in svn trunk.  We also need a
> mechanism to mark API as new in a particular API version.  I don't know
> if monodoc already automatically marks "Obsolete" API, if not, that
> would be a nice feature as well.

Would it not be right that the AssemblyVersion in the docs is the
version in which it was added?  At least that is how I was thinking (the
equivalent of gtk's since $version).  Monodoc handles [Obsolete] through
the updater I believe.