[Gtk-sharp-list] RE: GNOME Platform Bindings - first schedule date
Sun, 21 Dec 2003 09:23:20 -0800
On December 21, 2003 08:04 am, Martin Willemoes Hansen wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-12-21 at 08:17, Mike Kestner wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 03:09, Murray.Cumming@Comneon.com wrote:
> > > So, is this OK?
> > I had wanted to post some thoughts about this last week, and then got
> > called out of town unexpectedly on Wednesday for an uncle's funeral.
> > I won't be able to release anything targeting the 2.5 platform on the
> > 22nd. CVS is still targeting the 2.2 tarballs, and I want to push out
> > another release against 2.2 with all the recent advancements before
> > moving the target to 2.5.
> > This move will force all Gtk# CVS users to build the entire GNOME
> > platform from source. (Part of me thinks it's a bad idea to have Gtk#
> > CVS follow the C API this closely to the bleeding edge, but I know the
> > current situation is aggravated by the lack of a "stable" release of
> > Gtk#.) In the short term this is going to be a huge PITA for Gtk#
> > application developers, and I don't plan to maintain parallel 2.2 and
> > 2.5 branches.
> wow, I think it will be quite a pain for me to keep up with development
> releases of gnome :( How about making a release for gnome 2.4 as well
> before starting following 2.7 development releases?
Mike said he wanted to target 2.5, not 2.7.
I don't mind having to stick with a more or less stable release for 2.2
until 2.6 comes out. As long as it doesn't take ages and ages for
2.6. :) Gnome 2.6 is dependant on GTK 2.4 coming out, right? From a
quick glance at the GTK site that doesn't seem that close (no betas or