[Gtk-sharp-list] RE: GNOME Platform Bindings - first schedule date

[Murray.Cumming@Comneon.com]

So, is this OK?

Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
murrayc@usa.net

> -----Original Message-----
> From: gtk-sharp-list-admin@lists.ximian.com 
> [mailto:gtk-sharp-list-admin@lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of 
> Cumming Murray (CNET External)
> Sent: Donnerstag, 11. Dezember 2003 13:13
> To: language-bindings@gnome.org; gtk-sharp-list@lists.ximian.com
> Cc: release-team@gnome.org
> Subject: [Gtk-sharp-list] RE: GNOME Platform Bindings - first 
> schedule date
> 
> 
> Some bindings, such as Gtk#, are not on the 2.6 schedule 
> because they can not guarantee that they can follow the 
> API/ABI rules yet, but are trying to follow it so that they 
> can be on the 2.8 schedule.
> 
> I want to make these Beta bindings more prominent, so they 
> can get the benefit of publicity and encouragement as well. 
> But as part of that, I want you to _really_ try to follow the 
> schedule. I will need tarballs from Gtk# on the schedule 
> dates, just like we'll have tarballs from the other bindings. 
> And I hope to see discussions about the possibility of API 
> freezes, even if you don't actually manage to do them. I am 
> slightly concerned that I see no discussion of the GNOME 
> Platform Bindings release set in the Gtk# mailing list archives.
> 
> Murray wrote:
> > So, by December 22nd, we need tarballs for the modules that
> > you want to put on the schedule. Please send the list of 
> > modules, and download URLs to language-bindings@gnome.org. I 
> > will be merciless about schedule dates. 
> > 
> > In future, I will not CC desktop-devel-list, so please do
> > make sure that you are subscribed to language-bindings.
> > 
> > Murray Cumming
> > www.murrayc.com
> > murrayc@usa.net
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: language-bindings-admin@gnome.org 
> > > [mailto:language-bindings-admin@gnome.org] On Behalf Of Cumming 
> > > Murray (CNET External)
> > > Sent: Dienstag, 9. Dezember 2003 11:18
> > > To: desktop-devel-list@gnome.org; language-bindings@gnome.org
> > > Subject: GNOME Platform Bindings release set
> > > 
> > > 
> > > We now have a GNOME Platform Bindings release set. This 
> means that 
> > > we can give some bindings a schedule and rules to work within, and
> > > we can endores
> > > those bindings.
> > > 
> > > Rules: http://developer.gnome.org/dotplan/bindings/rules.html
> > > Schedule:
> > > http://www.gnome.org/start/2.5/bindings/
> > > 
> > > Note that those rules do not guarantee 100% API coverage,
> > but they do
> > > guarantee API/ABI stability.
> > > 
> > > At the moment, it's just gtkmm (C++) and gtk2-perl (Perl):
> > > http://www.gnome.org/start/2.5/bindings/modules.html
> > > 
> > > Expect others in the GNOME 2.8 schedule. I really think 
> that Python 
> > > should be in 2.6 too, and others if they can do it. For 2.6, they
> > have until
> > > December 22nd to give us the list of modules that they want
> > > to be put in the
> > > release set. Gtk# say they will do it unofficially and hope 
> > > to be in 2.8.
> > > 
> > > If you have questions about the GNOME Platform Bindings 
> release set 
> > > please send email to language-bindings@gnome.org. CC
> > > release-team@gnome.org if you
> > > want to appeal to a higher power. This might be reorganized a 
> > > bit in future.
> > > 
> > > Murray Cumming
> > > www.murrayc.com
> > > murrayc@usa.net _______________________________________________
> > > language-bindings mailing list  language-bindings@gnome.org 
> > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/language-bindings
> > > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > desktop-devel-list mailing list
> > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desk> top-devel-list
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> Gtk-sharp-list maillist  -  Gtk-sharp-list@lists.ximian.com 
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gt> k-sharp-list
>