[Gtk-sharp-list] Did I build GTK# on Rotor (aka Sared SourceCLI .NET)?

[Benjamin Voigt]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

I Will be on that (bug+patch for bsd/rotor) shortly... But just where
is the bugzilla/cvs for gtk#?

And yes, I have been using 0.1 since thats what is on the source
forge page....


Saludos ben
- --
Benjamin Voigt
ooooooooooooooooooo(,.+'^(http://www.shamiro.ch)^`+.,)oooooooooooooooo
oo
0x460x690x670x680x740x200x660x6F0x720x200x660x720x650x650x640x6F0x6D0x
21
PGP: http://pgpkeys.mit.edu
 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: gtk-sharp-list-admin@ximian.com 
> [mailto:gtk-sharp-list-admin@ximian.com] On Behalf Of Mike Kestner
> Sent: Dienstag, 18. Juni 2002 17:35
> To: Benjamin Voigt
> Cc: gtk-sharp-list@ximian.com
> Subject: Re: [Gtk-sharp-list] Did I build GTK# on Rotor (aka 
> Sared SourceCLI .NET)?
> 
> 
> On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 08:38, Benjamin Voigt wrote:
> 
> > The clix (application launcher) broke on the binaries 
> samples "Unable 
> > to load DLL (gtk-x11-2.0)", which made me wounder, since 
> freebsd does 
> > not have dlls... Any how, I guess it was looking for the shared 
> > objects, which, should be installed (libgtk-x11-2.0.so is in 
> > /usr/X11R6/lib and I did ldconfig... Severaltimes...).
> 
> The mono runtime has logic to look for .so dynamic libs.  I 
> have no experience with rotor and how its DllImport mechanism 
> works.  If it requires the full library name (with .so 
> extension) then this may need to be handled via some 
> attribute magic to map the library names for bsd/rotor.  
> There is going to need to be some similar mapping done to the 
> libgtk-win32* lib names.
> 
> > Anyhow, I thought it must be compiled to get it working... 
> Which made 
> > me write the make files (see attchment) to compile with Rotor. I 
> > essentialy added my path to csc changed the /recurse option to 
> > something I could use and removed the /unsafe switch, since I
> > could  not finde any unsafe code ... Finaly it did compile, after
> I actually 
> > had to change some code (You will notice the changes in 
> glib/Values.cs 
> > line 121). So fare so good... As fare as I'm concerned, it does 
> > compile on unix...
> 
> Thanks for looking into this.
> 
> > P.S.:
> > Please excuse me not including diff's I need to get used to 
> diff and 
> > patch again... It has been some time since I had to use them :)
> 
> It would be a big help if you could send me a diff, or open a 
> bug in bugzilla and post the diff there.  Also, I haven't had 
> a chance to unpack the attached tarball, but the name 
> suggests that you were hacking on the 0.1 release tree.  If 
> that's the case, the build system has changed a lot since 
> that release, so reworking the patch against current cvs 
> would help too.  
> 
> Thanks,
> Mike
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gtk-sharp-list maillist  -  Gtk-sharp-list@ximian.com 
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gtk-> sharp-list
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQCVAwUBPQ9IS+3dx9aqIeKpAQG2EwP/TcPOcrYzd5q7R6uuiMIfTcMzyy/n7taW
58c/60aPVpv/QjUCcICKMCHb5r/1nzaxAnIBU5hynLMpY49rj+inBALSbcCsHYqX
6r+MwpHSbNDgRojT0PBzZNQQXAgyI3XkOEvMNJKs7SJmScqKIRcY19orzsCEv57m
m9bchxTtnKc=
=vTtg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----