[Gtk-sharp-list] Problems installing Gtk# 0.4

Golo Haas webmaster@golohaas.de
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 22:04:05 +0200


Hi,

yes, both packages are installed correctly.

Greetings,


Golo Haas



Richard Torkar schrieb:
> Have you installed gtk+-2.* ?
> 
> 
> /Richard
> 
> On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 17:15, Golo Haas wrote:
> 
>>Hi,
>>
>>thanks for your answer, of course, if I use the prameter i instead of U, 
>>everything works fine ... sometimes you're just fooling yourself ;-).
>>
>>Now I've got only one question left, here's a part of the install protocol:
>>
>>******************
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>Package gtk+-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
>>Perhaps you should add the directory containing `gtk+-2.0.pc'
>>to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
>>No package 'gtk+-2.0' found
>>
>>Package gtk+-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
>>Perhaps you should add the directory containing `gtk+-2.0.pc'
>>to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
>>No package 'gtk+-2.0' found
>>
>>checking for libgnomecanvas-2.0 >= 2.0.0 libgnomeui-2.0 >= 2.0.0 
>>gtk+-2.0 >= 2.0.0 gmodule-2.0 >= 2.0.0... Package libgnomecanvas-2.0 was 
>>not found in the pkg-config search path.
>>Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libgnomecanvas-2.0.pc'
>>to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
>>
>>No package 'libgnomecanvas-2.0' found
>>checking for gtk+-2.0 >= 2.0.0 gmodule-2.0 >= 2.0.0... Package gtk+-2.0 
>>was not found in the pkg-config search path.
>>Perhaps you should add the directory containing `gtk+-2.0.pc'
>>to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
>>
>>No package 'gtk+-2.0' found
>>
>>configure: error: Library requirements (gtk+-2.0 >= 2.0.0 gmodule-2.0 >= 
>>2.0.0) not met; consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment 
>>variable if your libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can 
>>find them.
>>
>>**********************
>>
>>As I am very new to Linux, can anybody be so kind to tell me how to 
>>arrange that, and perhaps, what it means so that I can understand what I 
>>have to do?
>>
>>Thanks a lot,
>>
>>
>>Golo Haas
>>
> 
> 
> 
>