[Glade-users] Glade MacOSX binaries for last version?
Dieter Verfaillie
dieterv at optionexplicit.be
Sun Jul 17 15:00:09 EDT 2011
On 17/07/2011 20:19, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> However I think for now it's perfectly acceptable to dist win32/osx
> binaries of Glade 3.10 with the python plugin disabled until the
> gobject-introspection build eventually get's fixed.
Ok, I'll see what I can do...
> Also... I wonder what exactly is the part where the
> gobject-introspection build breaks,
It goes further than simply not building, it hasn't been ported yet.
See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=653167
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=652827
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=650763 and
https://github.com/dieterv/gobject-introspection/commit/f89cdf2620726e8f25a3341e0316663d382a90fc.
Some of that commit is reviving Tor's patch from
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620566
Then there's the work on py2cairo and PyGObject that needs
to be cleaned up and tested before it can all go to the
various upstream maintainers/bug databases.
I hope you're not regretting wondering about this now ;)
>> The script on the bug report assumes build/mswindows as sooner or
>> later the "32" in there is going to be irrelevant. Also that same
>> script should work fine to build 64 bit binaries by simply putting
>> mingw-w64's 64-bit producing toolchain on PATH before the 32-bit
>> producing mingw-w64 or mingw.org version. But I don't mind changing
>> it if you prefer win32.
>
> I don't really care about the name so much.
Ok, I'll leave the name as it is then.
mvg,
Dieter
More information about the Glade-users
mailing list