[Glade-users] Use GtkBuilder or libGlade in new codes?

[Micah Carrick]

Actually, along those lines...

I just started using GtkBuilder and for the most part, it's the same 
thing. The one extra step of running the conversion script isn't so bad 
as I just add it to the build process during development.

However, if I'm not mistaking, there is no replacement for 
glade_xml_signal_connect_data() and instead I have to write my own 
function to handle signal connections when I have different user_data 
for various callbacks which are not objects found within the UI file 
itself. Is this correct?

- Micah Carrick

  Developer - http://www.micahcarrick.com
  GTK+ Forums - http://www.gtkforums.com



Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> On Dec 26, 2007 11:59 AM, Lupine <thelupine at gmail.com 
> <mailto:thelupine at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 11:40 -0200, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
>
>     > Yes GtkBuilder is the new way, here is the tracker on builder
>     > support in glade:
>     >   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490678
>
>
>     Can you (or anyone else) shed some light on the benefits of this?  Was
>     there a problem with the libglade way?  Or was this a house-cleaning
>     deal to keep everything within Gtk itself?  Just Just curious,
>     because
>     my Googling so far hasn't turned up any of the expected "Wow, it's
>     ###%
>     faster using this" or "Wow, it this is ###% more efficient"...etc.
>      From
>     my limited knowledge of C, and first couple of glances at it, it just
>     looks like more code is needed to accomplish the same thing.
>
>
> Are we are talking about glade_xml_new() vs. gtk_builder_add_from_file() ?
>
> Building an interface in libglade or gtkbuilder is only a few lines of 
> code,
> how could this be of any consequence to anyone ?
>
> Cheers,
>                   -Tristan
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Glade-users maillist  -  Glade-users at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/glade-users
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/glade-users/attachments/20071226/dc1bc3b2/attachment.html