[Glade-devel] Invalid property values

[Shane Butler]

Ok well it sounds like either way would be good.
- Shane

On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 13:15, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:12:40 +1000, Shane Butler <shane.butler@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Are there any cases yet where you would want to refuse the change but
> > not have a set_function?
> 
> I have one case where I am aware that it is needed, and it happens to have 
> a set_function.
> 
> Now that I have to implement a way to deny the value, Is there a reason
> to make it exclusive to properties that have set_functions ?
> 
> Cheers,
>                                        -Tristan
> 
> Note:
>            Today I had to implement a workaround defaulting the "pattern"
> property of GtkLabel to "" instead of NULL, because it segfaults on NULL,
> I'm not sure it applies (i.e. the glade property editor probably sets a null
> charachter for an empty string as opposed to a NULL pointer) but I think
> its an example that shows the possibility of needing to verify values that
> don't have a set_function.
> _______________________________________________
> Glade-devel maillist  -  Glade-devel@lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/glade-devel