[Glade-devel] [glade-3] pixmap properties

Juan Carlos Orozco jorozco@ace-lab.com
Fri, 7 May 2004 06:30:07 -0500


J. Ali Harlow wrote:
>
> On 2004.05.06 14:39 Joaquin Cuenca Abela wrote:
> >
> > The g_object_set_data approach seems good enough to
> > me. These uses seems to be rare enough to need
> > anything else.
>
> Talking about g_object_set_data, what I have always wanted
> in glade is for the ability to set arbitary data for an
> object. This would allow me to keep all sorts of userful
> information in the .glade file rather than have it hardcoded
> in my programs. I currently do this by encoding information
> into the object name, but it's much less useful.

I want to second this request, in the OpenSource application for machine
tools MatPLC (http://mat.sf.net) for the Human Machine Interface creator we
use glade but we encode the information to link the widget to the IO (Input
Output point) in the widgets name wich is cumbersome and a limited solution.
Our application will also benefit if we could store something like
properties for the widgets in the form of name and value both as character
strings.

Regards,

    Juan Carlos Orozco
            Director

ACElab Industrial Automation
http://www.acelab.com