[Glade-devel] Why libxml2 and not GMarkupParser?
Joaquin Cuenca Abela
e98cuenc@yahoo.com
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:10:02 -0800 (PST)
--- James Henstridge <james@daa.com.au> wrote:
> On 13/01/04 04:47, Tim Müller wrote:
>
> GMarkupParser only accepts a small subset of valid
> XML files. Is that
> subset good enough? Some of the things not
> supported include:
>
> * files in encodings other than UTF-8
> * entities other than >, < and &
> * anything related to DTDs ...
>
> What limitations do other glade file consumers have?
> What features do
> glade file producers produce?
I don't know of a lot of glade consumers/producers.
To my knowledge the list includes:
* glade2
* glade3
* libglade
* glade2c
* edalg
On glade3 I would like to stick to the XML subset
readable by GMarkupParser. edalg doesn't work well
enough to be important, and anyway it produces
GMarkupParser compliant glade files.
Cheers,
=====
Joaquin Cuenca Abela
e98cuenc at yahoo dot com
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus